transContext

Mrs. S.,

I still don’t assume causality and am still inclined to suggest “otherwise”.

If we should have the opportunity to speak again thereafter, soon there may be both language and context for us to discuss a kind of response.

You suggested that, to propose other than causality, I must offer an alternative.

Then much as now, I don’t see a sense of implied obligation to demonstrate or convince as material to the relevance, suitability, or sharing of the notion in question.

I do maintain that, before or outside of any proposals by people, “what might have been” may have been and “what may yet be” may yet be.

The demand for an alternative may, in turn, assume causality, which may not be conducive to entertaining the notions other than causality.

Regarding that language and that context… it may indeed be very, very succinct and welcome on your part.  They may together serve to at once attract a fruitfully new kind of attention, which may, in turn, as well support a simple reflection too basic and primordial for efficient and practiced minds to comfortably volunteer.

I hope we’ll both be around to talk then and there.

Whatever the feelings through your words, I thank you for encouraging me along the ways of the world. My own practice in those ways is a significant part of what distinguishes me now from me then;  I have learned much the fashionable cognitive idiom to speak to those timeless and wordless things that we accept by our very existence–and yet, don’t.

I’m still learning : )

–Steve

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Tags: armchair, Causality, dialog, letters, open letter, theory, way of the world, ways

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 28th, 2009 at 18:09 and is filed under Causality, Open Letters. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.